It is a well-documented fact that early in his career, Adolf Hitler took inspiration from Benito Mussolini, his senior colleague in fascism.
But an equally important role model for Hitler and the Nazis has been almost entirely neglected: Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the founder of modern Turkey and perpetrator of one of the most horrific episodes of ethnic cleansing and genocide against his non-Turk populations.
The historian Stefan Ihrig’s compelling book “Ataturk in the Nazi Imagination” outlines and meticulously documents this largely unknown story. This work also promises to rewrite our understanding of the roots of Nazi ideology and strategy.
Hitler was deeply interested in Turkish affairs after 1919. He not only admired but also sought to imitate Ataturk’s radical construction of a new nation from the ashes of defeat in World War I.
Hitler and the Nazis watched closely as Ataturk defied the Western powers to seize government, and they modeled the Munich Putsch to a large degree on Ataturk’s rebellion in Ankara.
Hitler later remarked that, in the political aftermath of WWI, Ataturk was his master while he and Mussolini were his students.
This was no fading fascination. As the Nazis struggled through the 1920s, Ataturk remained Hitler’s “star in the darkness,” his inspiration for remaking Germany along nationalist, secular, totalitarian and ethnically exclusive lines.
Nor did it escape Hitler’s notice how ruthlessly Turkish governments had dealt with Armenian and Greek minorities, whom influential Nazis directly compared with German Jews. The New Turkey, or at least those aspects of it that the Nazis chose to see, became a model for Hitler’s plans and dreams in the years leading up to the invasion of Poland.
Christopher Clark, professor at the University of Cambridge, said:
“From the Armenian massacres to the Turkish War of Independence and the rise of Kemal Ataturk, Turkish events attracted deep interest in Germany. As Ihrig shows, politically active Germans of the Weimar Republic, especially on the far right, saw in Turkey a model for successful revisionism, authoritarian rule, secular modernization and the political utility of genocide. This brilliant and original study sheds new light on the rise of Nazism and the pre-history of Nazi racial policy.”
Order your copy of “Ataturk in the Nazi Imagination” by clicking here
Is The Pappas Post worth $5 a month for all of the content you read? On any given month, we publish dozens of articles that educate, inform, entertain, inspire and enrich thousands who read The Pappas Post. I’m asking those who frequent the site to chip in and help keep the quality of our content high — and free. Click here and start your monthly or annual support today. If you choose to pay (a) $5/month or more or (b) $50/year or more then you will be able to browse our site completely ad-free!
Click here if you would like to subscribe to The Pappas Post Weekly News Update
5 comments
Your book seems science fiction as no logical way to prove that
Attaturk volunteered for the Bolshevik revolution, which is why Lenin lent him Chechens to kill off the Smyrna Greeks because the Turks actually sympathized with their Greek neighbors.
I dont know if you are claiming to be a historian but if you are you may want to start using facts. I take you are a Greek ethnicity and I understand that you may have personal issues with Turks and maybe an unfinished business with them but trying to right a total BS article will not help. Peace!
Let us start from the common denominator, Ataturk was a Hazar Turk of a later cast following a cruel cult of misrepresented jewish underground way of life. Hitler is also said to have been the unrecognised son of the Rithchilds’ who were also Hazars who took the jewish faith but kept their animistic, personality swifting attitudes, thus their continuous changing of names to infiltrate western societies. It is curious why after the great masacres of the 1922 population exchanges, greek priminister El Venizelos proposed Ataturk for Peace Nobel price, these two men are also said to have family relations, as cousins. That is why Venizelos didi nothing to protect greek populations when the greek army had rights iver the wining side of the First War, the programme was given by their common Masonic fraternities Venizelow and Ataturk belonged, to create exclusive ethnic states!
I dont catch what is Ahirkidis explaning???????